Tuesday, May 27, 2008

Textbooks

Of course students should have to pay for textbooks they’ve lost. As soon as they check it out, that book becomes their responsibility, just like any library book. The district is lending it out and shouldn’t have to foot the bill when the student loses it.

The amount of money the Rochester City School District has lost to missing textbooks is evidence enough. Something in the neighborhood of half a million dollars has been spent buying new books, and that money could certainly be put to other uses. If students don’t care enough about their textbooks to keep track of them, they shouldn’t be too bothered when they have to part with 40 bucks.

And what message does it send when the district lets students get away with losing school property? If students aren’t penalized for losing textbooks, or just never returning them, there will be no incentive to give them back. When you look at some of the things that get sold on eBay, it would be hard to deny that a relatively new textbook could make a few bucks. With the policy as it is, what’s keeping a student from going out and selling their books?

I’ve also heard, though I can’t verify it, that people are supposed to learn things at school. And is there a more important lesson to be taught then responsibility? Students need to know there are consequences for their actions, and they need to be able to keep track of their belongings or belongings loaned to them. If you get a job and then lose your employer’s property, you’ll both have to pay for the property and be fired. The City School District wouldn’t be doing their job if they didn’t prepare their pupils for the real world.

Progress Report

I think I've made decent progress on my project. It's difficult to always find inspiration, but there is usually something bugging me I can write about. This post is number 19, so I'm pretty pleased.

I have actually worked consisitantly on this. Whenever I come upon a moron in the D and C letters to the editor, I'm able to write about him on this blog. In the next few classes I just want to keep doing what I'm doing, but perhaps shy away from lampooning English class as much as I have been.

I haven't really edited my blog all that much. However, I repeatedly force classmates into reading my posts and commenting so there are fewer "0 comments" things.

I've discovered that my "writers voice" enjoys stating it's opinion, often brashly, and sometimes fixates on things like English.

Monday, May 19, 2008

More English

I stand by my views: English is crap. And you know what? I'm using the first freaking person.

I'll first focus on the terrifying, systematic destruction of good literature that takes place in classrooms across the country. It's my sound belief that the true beauty in books is their ploy, the ability to entertain. I don't give a rats ass what Simon symbolizes in the Lord of the Flies. I couldn't care less about which of the 25 different literary terms Sophocles used in Antigone. And I'm adamant in the belief that Will Shakespeare wrote Julius Caesar for a quick buck just as much as the need to comment on society and totalitarianism.

And while we're at it, an English teacher just recently said that using "I" was childish and "you" was arrogant. I disagree. Stating your opinion, rather than being childish, is the hieght of sophistication. Our forefathers fought for the freedom of the press, the freedom to say whatever the hell you want to. The ability to say what you beleive, to ignore the mold and put your opinions out there, is far more important to me then correctly analyzing the subplots of the Pearl.

Friday, May 16, 2008

Wiretapping

I saw a letter to the editor in the paper yesterday. The author was saying that a Democratic president would be weak on national security. He cited what a heck of a job Bush had done by strengthening the FBI and CIA and wiretapping domestically.

So this is where the author and I differ. Yes, it should always be a top priority to protect the people of this nation, but I also value privacy. I doubt we’ll be jumping straight from wiretapping to the Big Brother situation of 1984, but it’s still a dangerous path. There’s a reason the government used to be required to get warrants to wiretap, and that’s because we need our personal lives to be, well, personal.

Of course, I doubt that the government’s listening in on the average Joe’s conversation. They probably do stick to people they think are terrorists. But I have to wonder, if they have enough reason to believe they’re terrorists, shouldn’t they have enough proof to get a legal warrant to spy?

Though not near as drastic a situation as Japanese internment, I can still draws parallels between the two. The government wanted to keep the country safe, but in doing so they did some very wrong things. It corresponds to imprisonment of terror suspects in Guantanamo. If we have enough reason them to through them in a cell for the rest of their lives, shouldn’t we have enough evidence to charge them? The government shouldn’t have the right be judge and jury, and I genuinely believe that there are other ways to protect this nation.

...

Whenever I hear about baseball players from the 1800s, I feel sad. Take Ross Barnes. He has the third highest single-season batting average of all time in the MLB, but I’ve never even heard of the guy. He would have been a giant in his day, an icon, a baseball hero. There must have been parades in his honor; his name would have been plastered across the newspapers. But you know what? I’d never even heard of him before last week.

So it really makes me wonder how long it takes your legacy to die, how long it takes for your name to mean nothing, how many generations pass before the people just don’t care about your accomplishments. I had NO idea that John Tyler was our 10th president. Or Franklin Pierce (Number 14), James Buchanan, Rutherford B. Hayes or William Harding. And they were our PRESIDENTS. Commander in Chief, Leader of the Free World, all that good stuff. And as for the vice presidents? I know Gore and Cheney, but that’s it.

So is my life meaningless? I can make an impact on as many people as I please, but eventually I’ll die and they die, and even if they their kids about me, those kids will die too. At some point, everything I might ever accomplish in the rest of my life will mean nothing. And that kind of sucks.

And death, hoo boy. I’ve never been able to just take things on faith, and while it’s great to believe there’s an after life, and that would sure makes things a lot easier, I just can’t make that leap. And I know that scientifically speaking, when my brain shuts down, when the last synapses dies away, there will be nothing. Nothing. Not even darkness to see, silence to hear. Nothing. And that kind of sucks too.

Wednesday, May 14, 2008

Mary's story.

Kudos to Mary Rice, author of a fantasy story based around the food-world of Fantasty. Here's an excerpt:

The land of Fantasty is a wonder, a birthday cake-shaped planet whirling deliciously in the middle of space. This cake, baked golden by time long, long ago, is divided into three layer-realms, each distinct and separated by a layer of frosting. Fantasty itself thrives on the topmost layer, a confection of a realm, with mountains of ice cream, rivers of milk and maple syrup, jungles of twisted spaghetti, and wide open deserts of soft white flour, light as a dream. Far below it, on the bottommost layer, lies the wretched realm of Fanasty, cursed with artificial flavoring, food coloring, and high-fructose corn syrup. Between these two layers, as different as night and day, lie the Doldrums, the Blandlands, a wasteland of stale water crackers, surrounded by frosting swamps on its edges.

Three birthday candles stand tall and proud on this marvel of a planet, thrusting up over Fantasty and giving sailors on the Fruit Punch Sea a beacon to guide them in their travels. The Fasntastians, be they Veggitopians, Sugarlandians, or Karbs, pride themselves on their exceptional culinary skills, and the highest honor a young Fantastian can hope for is to become a high chef, master of food and its preparation. And thus our story begins.

* * * *

"Filth," said Elias, knocking the bowl of mushroom pate aside. He had been working on it for hours now, and still he could not find the correct flavor he desired. He was about to dump the grey-brown paste into the bin under the sink when a voice stilled his hand.
"Why so agitated, Elias? You have an excellent start there."
Elias turned to meet the gaze of Highchef Fiorenzo, who was standing there, short and squat in his bright white chef's hat.
"Uncle Fio, I cannot create the flavor I seek. It is flat and ordinary." Elias ran his hands through his thick head of chestnut hair in frustration.
"Ahhh," said the chef wisely, "Look to your herbs and spices, my boy! There must be something here to give your dish the pizzazz you so desire. Go on, experiment! You are more talented than you realize."
Fiorenzo watched his foster child walk hopefully to the spice rack, where he perused the rows of tiny glass bottles, sniffing the fragrances. Sixteen years had passed since Fio had found the boy as an abandoned infant, deep in the Enchanted Broccoli Forest in Fiberland. He had been on an expedition for wild mushrooms at the time, and had heard the baby's cries echo through the forest. He had assumed the child had come from the nearby village of Leef, on the banks of the Water River. Fio looked musingly at the pile of mushroom beside Elias' cooking station, remembering. Though the chef had looked far and wide for the boys' parents, no one had ever come forward to claim the lost child.
Fio had brought the boy back to Veggitopia, where he ran the most renowned culinary institute in Fantasty: the School of the Chefs. The school sat on one of the farthest corners of Fiberland, looking out over Nutshell Bay. There, Fio had begun the boys' training when he reached the age of six. He had shown remarkable skill from the start, and Fiorenzo knew he would be great: he could feel it. He could see it in the way Elias handled the food, how he gave loving attention to every element, how he looked for ways to make things better than they already were. Elias had completed his tenth year of training only last month, an important milestone, for this was the age that the budding chef received his or her Magic Utensil, a cooking utensil suited to serve that chef's needs and create the most glorious food when it was used. Elias had received the Golden Whisk, and he treasured it greatly. He used it wisely and carefully, for though a chef has a Magic Utensil, true skill will prevail over the stove. And Elias had this true skill. He was the top of his class by far, and knew as much or more than some of those in the highest form. Yet Fiorenzo felt it was prudent to let the Elias remain in his own age class, where he would hopefully make friends with people his own age.
Chef Fiorenzo sometimes worried that Elias was not becoming socialized as he ought to be. He was a sullen boy, who could usually be found taking long walks alone. Fio had once asked Elias if he felt lonely, and he had replied with a shrug, "I dunno, Uncle Fio, I never really thought about it." Then he had switched the discussion abruptly to the souffle he was making. He was caught up in his craft, and often became angry with himself when he made an error. Fio knew the boy had talent, but Elias seemed under-confident and modest to the extreme. For a lad who had grown up in the kitchen, he was awfully unsure of his skills.
The cooking classes offered at the school were various and consumed nearly all of Elias's time. He was currently studying with the Chef of Sauces, the Chef of the Knives, the Chef of Herbs, the Chef of Baking, and many others besides. In the evenings Elias and Fiorenzo would retreat to the school's highest tower where they lived, and Fio would tell Elias of his travels through distant lands. He told him of the steep, jagged peaks of the Tortilla Chip Moutains that divided Fiberland, and the Flour Desert beyond that. He told him of the sweet, flat expanses of the Pancake Plains, where the ground is soft and golden and steams under one's feet. He told him of the sheer, icy blocks that made up the Popsicle Glaciers in Sugarland, and the Hot Fudge Springs that bubbled up from under the surface. One day, Fio promised, he would take Elias on an expedition through the rich lands of Fiberland, Dairyland, the Carbohydrate Kingdom, and Sugarland, across the red Fruit Punch Sea. Elias was most eager to go. "When you are finished with your training and are a true High Chef, you will see all of this delicious land," Fio said time and time again, when Elias pressed him. "I promise, one way or another, you will."

Monday, May 12, 2008

More English nonsense

I think I've been over this before, but I'll go over the English final again. We do the task I essay and the task III essay during midterms and take II and IV over finals. As our class prepares to take this pivotal test, we go over both tasks, and now we're working through IV. It goes something like this: you're given a quote, you agree or disagree with it, and then you prove your agreement or lack there of. Here's the two catches, which both make English one of the most infuriating subjects I've ever dealt with: One, you can't use the first person. That's pretty standard for essays, but seeing as you have to state your OPINION, it's kind of an obstacle.

The second: you can't use real life events to prove your quote. You have to use literary references.

And this bothers me, because what the board of Regents considers to be literature is fiction. How can you use fiction, imagination, to prove a quote that has relevance to real life? Just because something happens in literature doesn't mean it can happen in real life. Dragons don't pop up out of hill sides, slaughtering goblins and hobbits. You can't prove something using fiction, using, well, artistic lies, stories. And it would just be so much easier if I just used modern day events or history in general. But I can't. The graders will actually take off points if I mention events that actually shape the world far more then A Wrinkle in Time ever can.

It's bull...how really can my knowledge of events in the Odyssey help the world, do anything more then fill up space in my brain alongside Latin conjugations and the number of protons in Strontium (38). My time could be far better spent, and it rather upsets me.

Thursday, May 8, 2008

Rev. Wright

Rev. Wright is a moron and a jerk. This country is great and the people who died in 9/11 did not deserve to. But I think we're focusing on the situation a little too much. There are so many nuts jobs in the world (i.e Mahmoud Ahmadinejad or that cult dude from Texas), we should just get over it. I don't beleive Obama shares those same views. I have a close relative who I love with all my heart who's a socialist. I don't share the veiws; in fact, we just don't talk politics at all.

So my wish? I really hope we could just focus on the issues. Is it really plausible to pull troops out of Iraq within 60 days? If Canada has a functioning universal healthcare system and has yet to fall behind an iron curtain, why can't we? And did the two candidates only start talking about NAFTA because they were in a state that had been hard hit by the plan?

I just thank the dude upstairs that I'm not voting this November.

Tuesday, May 6, 2008

Canal

I don't know if you've heard of the plan to reroute the Erie Canal downtown, but let me tell you, it's as stupid as it sounds. A few individuals, probably the same ones who masterminded the Ferry, think the city would be better off if we dug up Broadstreet and funneled the canal through it. They believe that people would flock to a waterfront as they have in Pittsford and other canal towns.

So to these advocates of the canal, I say this: Take out a map of Rochester. Find downtown. Then look for the big BLUE SQUIGGLY THING that runs downtown. Some call it a RIVER.

Let me make myself clearer. The Genesee River is beautiful, and there are a few nice locations right alongside it, Cornhill for instance. You can practically fall into the river from there. So why do people assume that spending millions of dollars creating another waterway will revive the downtown economy? That money would be better spent developing a preexisting waterway.